Strategic Protection for Partners and Avoiding Communities of Heirs
Financial security for the surviving spouse is a cornerstone of proactive estate planning. Many couples mistakenly assume that a partner automatically becomes the sole heir upon death. In reality, German law dictates that the survivor must form a community of heirs (Erbengemeinschaft)—either with their children or, if there are no descendants, typically with the deceased’s parents or siblings. Such communities carry significant potential for conflict, as decisions regarding the estate—such as the management or sale of the family home—generally require unanimous consent.
​
DR. SCHMIDT LEGAL assists clients in securing their partner's autonomy through bespoke testamentary dispositions, protecting them from the uncertainties and potential deadlocks inherent in a statutory community of heirs.
Statutory Inheritance Quotas and the Risk of Co-Heirship
Under German law, the spouse’s statutory inheritance quota depends largely on the matrimonial property regime and which surviving relatives of the first or second order exist. In the standard regime of community of accrued gains (Zugewinngemeinschaft), the survivor typically inherits half of the estate alongside children, or three-quarters alongside parents or siblings. The resulting "joint ownership" (Gesamthandsverhältnis) means the spouse cannot dispose of any single asset alone. Without a Will, they would be required to coordinate every decision—from bank accounts to real estate—with the co-heirs.
​
DR. SCHMIDT LEGAL meticulously analyses these scenarios to prevent the formation of such cumbersome communities through clear testamentary appointments of heirs.
The "Berlin Will": Balancing Security and Tax Risks
A frequently chosen instrument for protection is the joint Will, in which spouses appoint each other as sole heirs (the so-called "Berlin Will"). This arrangement ensures that the survivor can initially dispose of the joint assets without restriction and is not dependent on the consent of children or more distant relatives. However, DR. SCHMIDT LEGAL advises that this model is not always the optimal solution. Particularly with larger estates, it can lead to significant tax disadvantages, as the children’s tax-free allowances remain unused in the first instance of inheritance, and the same assets may be taxed again upon the second death. Furthermore, the binding nature of a joint Will can limit the surviving partner's flexibility, making a case-by-case review essential.
Strategies for Managing Compulsory Share Claims
While appointing a spouse as sole heir strengthens their legal position, it can trigger compulsory share claims (Pflichtteilsansprüche). Since the law guarantees children (and, under certain conditions, parents) a minimum monetary entitlement, the estate's liquidity can be severely strained if these parties demand their share immediately. To prevent the surviving partner from having to sell assets under pressure to settle these claims, DR. SCHMIDT LEGAL develops strategies to minimise compulsory shares. This includes, for example, the inclusion of "compulsory share penalty clauses" (Pflichtteilsstrafklauseln) or advice on notarial waiver agreements in exchange for compensation.
Usufruct and Legacies as Tax-Optimised Alternatives
In complex family structures or where assets exceed tax-free thresholds, it may be advisable to move away from a simple sole heirship and instead utilise legacies (Vermächtnisse) or rights of use. For instance, a surviving partner can be secured through a lifelong usufruct (Nießbrauch) or a right of residence in the property, while the underlying ownership passes to the next generation for tax purposes.
DR. SCHMIDT LEGAL drafts these instruments to ensure the partner retains a secure, lifelong right to live in and use the property, while simultaneously optimising the inheritance tax burden for the entire family by utilising multiple tax-free allowances.